Paintings are boring. They are made by old guys who loved a long time ago. That’s at least what I thought when I was little.
On we went to the National Portrait Gallery. Many big and old paintings. And to be honest: Many of them were really not my cup of tea. But instead of going back to my old way of thinking, I thought: “How can I make this interesting? How can I still learn something?”. I believe I have found a way. When I look at a painting and my first instinct is “I don’t like this”, I try to look at it differently. For the painter the subject was probably the most important part. But who says that I can’t look at the frame instead? I like to consider if it accentuates the actual painting or poses as a contrast. Then I see the actual image. How might it look in different color scheme and perspective? Suddenly I see how the light highlights certain parts, while others are merging into the background. Did the artist only want you to see some areas or did he want you to find the hidden parts as well? Also the title of the painting seems different to the subject…why is that? I don’t know. But by examining a painting from a formal point of view I actually grew to like them. One of them that really stuck in my mind was this painting by the Norwegian Peder Balke.
![balke](https://rephannahstockem.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/balke.jpg?w=636)
It has the most beautiful shade of green and the light is amazing. After looking at it for a few minutes, I really saw what a difference it can make to approach (museum) in a different way than before.
Peder Balke, 12.11. 2014-12.4.2015, National Gallery, London